I’m not the only one with something to show and no easy way to show it, there is a lot of content out there that most of us just can’t get in front of eyeballs. Sure most of it is pretty ugly (I think mine is borderline but then again most parents have an elevated opinion on the beauty of their own children) but some of it will just have fallen through the cracks of distributorship. There are a few emerging channels for us.
Direct to DVD is the cheapest and that still entails creating a quality DVD image and getting commercial grade copies made. Burning copies on your own computer is more expensive after the first hundred or so and wouldn’t be compatible with a lot of DVD players out there. After you do that you are left wondering how to let anyone know about it and make it actually available? A single thirty second spot during the television show Lost will set you back about half a million dollars. How many did you want? Blockbuster might take a few copies and bury them out in the Siberia of D2DVD land where it will molder away in obscurity.
Theatrical release is an option for those who want to four wall theatres themselves and have the money to do so. This runs about $120,000 for a week in twenty markets if you take Mark Cuban up on Truly Indie. This price includes an ad buildup to the release so people actually know it exists.
So just ballparking the numbers, if you are going to do a tiny theatrical run and then go to DVD you will have to spend at the very least $150,000 after you have the film ready to go. And this number is pretty nice compared to what the option was before Cuban came along with his digital projection option (still being rolled out), getting 20 duplicates in 35mm film would cost another $60,000 or so and that doesn’t include the extra $30,000 to create that 35mm print in the first place if you shot on digital.
This is predicated on the idea that the content is worth buying a movie ticket or a DVD to see it. My pilot is rough enough that I wouldn’t expect very many people to be happy after paying $10 for a ticket or $15 for a DVD. But if they could get it for free I think they would be a little more forgiving and may even be able to enjoy it for what it is. Hell, it was my first time directing and editing anything so can we really be surprised that it isn’t polished and pretty?
I could host it myself on my website but we run into bandwidth problems if even a a small number of people decide to check out at a few hundred megabytes per download. And then we are still stuck with the problem of no one even knowing that the thing exists.
Apple’s distribution of video through its iPod has potential but that is where it will remain since Apple is all about helping the big guy. Their video distribution is geared towards the ABCs of the world and little ol’ me can just stand outside the castle that Jobs built and dream. Even if Steve did deign to look down at us, he will charge us something like 25 to 50 cents for each and every download. Free to the user means cost to me and while I don’t figure many people would want to pay me to see Ragnarok I am absolutely certain that I don’t want to pay them to see it.
Sony had the potential to do Apple one better with the PSP, which is a better video playback device than the Video iPod… but they are Sony and I am just surprised that they allow us to create and upload our own video to our own PSP.
This is where Google Video comes in.
There are a lot of questions yet about just how it will work but Google Video might be the answer to the little guy’s distribution problems.
The first thing they need to incorporate is allowing downloading as an option so that people can actually take full advantage of the tens of millions of iPods and PSPs that are being sold. They should have at least three optimized versions of the downloadable content or have the ability to encode on the fly for the iPod, the PSP and for full resolution on the computer. Streaming video sucks. You watch it then and there and if you stop at any time, you have to go back to the website and stream it all over again. It is old school broadcast television in the age of Tivo. Sure, if someone is adamant that this be the one and only way to view the show then they could mandate that it be streaming only. I want to let people download it and I should have that option.
The second thing is that they say that there will be no upper limit on the size of the file but that they might charge for the download or add to whatever you are charging if it exceeds a certain bandwidth usage. I need to know what that limit is and have the option of throttling the downloads to keep below whatever daily limit they set. The Union of BC Performers has a low and no budget contract that let a few of their actors work on a volunteer capacity only as long as it was a non-commercial production. I can’t make money off this particular execution of my script without triggering the compensation clause of the contract. The moment I make my first $1 that means I owe the actors 10 cents and oh the can of worms that would open up if it accidentally triggered that mountain of paperwork. It will never make $1000 and so I would end up spending a lot of money trying to get the owed $100 spread around to the actors. I’m not sure at what point I could actually afford to be paid for the show but I am sure that it is more than anyone would want to pay for it.
To take full advantage of this for micro budget series, Google Video needs those things straightened out. Downloading with the option of using RSS to subscribe for the viewers iPod, PSP or computer would be my first priority. Since Google is built on advertising, will they be able to accept this or will they focus myopically on keeping your eyes on the video.google.com pages? The usefulness of this will plummet if that is the case. May I suggest a Google Video watermark over the video as a compromise? Some wouldn’t accept that but I would.
The money thing has to be worked out. At what volume will Google’s cut get triggered and will we be able to lighten our fee to offset the increase with the hope that the volume makes up for it? Another niggling detail is that multiple small payments are a pain in the pocket book for everyone but the company charging to run the transactions. Will Google allow people to buy a $10 “roll of tickets” from them so that they can spend 25 cents on this little show, $2 on that more polished production and $5 on an RSS subscription to the next ten episodes of a machinima series… while keeping the remaining $2.75 for the next time the customer finds something worth paying for?
And that gets us to the key to the whole thing, how does anyone find out about your content without spending big dollars on advertising? Google really needs to get people to rate the shows they watch – both what they watched on television and on Google Video. The online DVD rental companies like Zip.ca and Netflix.com are examples of what they need to do so that Google will be able to recommend a show. Ratings would allow the best content to rise to the top while tracked who rated what could let them tell the visitor “Since you rate Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Supernatural and Lord of the Rings as amongst your favorites, may Google suggest you try Ragnarok: the Series?” A “pick your favorites” page could help guide those who are reluctant to let Google retain detailed stats on what they want to watch.
Over the next year or two, we should find out if there is any way for Google Video to give the numbers needed for a micro indie series to exist. I’ll go deeper into how I think that could work and rough out some dollar figures in another post… this one is already getting pretty damn long winded.
Archive for October, 2005
Content is Easy, Distribution is Hard
October 31st, 2005
Clint It Takes Two PVRs to Keep up to Me
October 28th, 2005
Clint Because I want to write for television, but do not yet actually have a job doing so, I watch an inordinate amount of it. I try to catch every new pilot and with most series that is where it ends. There are usually several series a year that I watch/study. The following is a fairly complete listing with some attempts at justification.
With the exception of The Contender last year I don’t watch ANY of the reality shows. They all seem to be about showcasing the ugliest aspects of humanity… or they are really big karaoke contests. Either way I can’t be bothered.
The Shows I Watch/Study:
Arrested Development
- A funny sitcom? I genuinely can’t remember the last time.
My Name is Earl
- A second funny sitcom? With an interesting premise? Unprecedented.
Prison Break
-An interesting concept and it will be a trick to keep it interesting once they break out. Now if it turns out that they are chasing a one armed man…
House
-The writing team delivers the pain and the funny damn near as well as the Joss teams did. Hugh Laurie is the best actor on television right now and was robbed of the Emmy.
Surface
-I am a genre guy so I watch this show… it is also interesting to see how it differs from Threshold and Invasion.
Threshold
-I’m a genre guy and so this is a show I watch… I also enjoy seeing how similar it is to Surface and Invasion.
Invasion
-I watch this series because I enjoy genre… it also intrigues me how they almost seem to carry themes across from Threshold and Surface.
Bones
-It isn’t bad but I may drop it. The only procedural that really caught my attention was ‘The Inside’ and so of course they cancelled it. Most bore me to tears.
The Night Stalker
-The production values are higher than Supernatural and the acting is good… but it just isn’t as engaging. It doesn’t help that Kolchak comes across as a very passive protagonist and barely seems there. If I had been handed this, I would have made him a radio talk show host who is constantly warning people about the things he finds and is dismissed by everyone as a crank. He’d still be investigating the occult but then he would be trying his best to get the word out. As it is, he investigates the supernatural and then chats to himself about it.
Supernatural
-I like it. There are slips and stumbles in the logic and the production values aren’t up there with The Night Stalker… but I want to write for this show. I’d like to try and fix The Night Stalker but I would just like to join the writing room for this show.
Smallville
-The closest thing to a Joss Whedon show right now and I would love to write for Millar and Gough. The mythic arc right along with the personal is good stuff. I figure the time is getting right for bringing in some suits and the Green Lantern is just the man to do it. Admittedly the acting left something to be desired in the first couple of years but Tom Welling, Kristen Kreuk, and Allison Mack have all grown in skill and Erica Durance is a better Lois Lane than Brian Singer’s Kate Bosworth… but then Tom Welling is far more Superman than the slightly slimy soap stud Brandon Routh. Right from the start, Michael Rosenbaum and John Glover where incredible as the Luthors. They do occasionally put out an episode that… well lets just say that the latest (Oct. 27 – Thirst) could have been lifted from the Charmed script pile. I expect more from Steve DeKnight.
Alias
-It is more momentum than anything else that keeps me watching this show. They tend to stretch the bounds of believability and coincidence far more than I would like. And if one more person comes back from the dead I will stop watching this show. Yeah, I’m talking to you Mr. Vaughn.
Lost
-I still like this show even though it seems to be weighed down by the effort to keep pulling a story out of their butt at the last minute.
The Simpsons
-Heading towards 400 episodes and still makes me chuckle. Not so fresh but still worth watching.
Family Guy
-There is some rudeness here and I like that the humour can be crude and subtle at the same time.
American Dad
-A lot of crude and not so much the subtle… the pilot was horrible but I caught a later episode and it was hilarious and so I’ve gone back to watching it.
Veronica Mars
-Nancy Drew with a stun gun… and every bit as fun as that sounds.
Rome
-The best new series so far this year and shows how a period piece should be done. They didn’t try and transplant this weeks social patterns on a very different era, they took the times that were and found the people who could have been there. This is a show where the protagonists have just returned from helping the republic of Rome subjugate a foreign land. One of them comes back with a collection of slaves to sell to get a business started while the other is traveling with a slave girl he stole from the men who enslaved her. The times were different and the show rolls with that… these are the good guys despite doing things that today would brand them as the unmitigated villains. This makes it a far more interesting show than ABC’s very tepid Empire.
Guilty Pleasures:
Las Vegas
-It’s light, it’s fun and the ladies are pretty… hey, I don’t have to justify myself!.
The O.C.
-More guilt than pleasure this year and I may drop it. The Cohen banter made this geek sit up and notice but I haven’t been missing it while Fox strangles it with baseball preemptions.
The good (or at least watchable) shows that I don’t watch:
24
-The first season was fresh and interesting… the second season felt like a rerun of the first and so I haven’t gone back to it. It might be interesting to get the DVD set and do a marathon session.
Gilmore Girls
-The writing on this show is top notch but the premise and execution doesn’t appeal to me. This is not a negative evaluation, a damn fine show… just not for me.
Criminal Minds
-I’ve watched a few episodes and they have a good cast and writers… but procedurals just aren’t my thing.
Looking Forward to:
The Unit
- David Mamet as the creator and executive producer? The Untouchables was a few years back but I’m hoping he rises above the procedural quagmire. Shawn Ryan is collaborating with him on this and The Shield was hard hitting work so I will definitely give this a try.
The “Watch this or get bamboo slivers under the fingernails? Let me think about it for a minute.” award goes to -
Commander in Chief
-I honestly tried to watch this. I sat through the pilots for Joey, Young Blades and Stacked… you learn from the bad as well as the good. But I couldn’t sit through this show. Every character dripped with smug self righteous arrogance and I just couldn’t keep watching it.
Fifteen plus hours is a lot of television but it is job preparation as well as entertainment. At least it’s dropping down from the twenty-five plus hours per week that it is for the start of pilot season. Try doing that while also working ninety to a hundred hours a week.
The only way that I can keep up on all the new shows is with two satellite receivers saving them to the hard drives. The networks may hate me skipping the commercials but if that means I can save five hours out of the typical week then I am going to skip the damn commercials. I buy everything right down to my shampoo based on reviews and testing anyway so the advertising dollar is completely wasted on me.
Smallville 05-05: Thirst
October 27th, 2005
Clint Steve DeKnight is usually a fine writer but I don’t know what he was thinking with this one… maybe they were getting behind and he had to recycle that spec script he did for ‘Charmed’ a few years back? A fair bit of this actually made me wince and I’m thinking that it might just be Steve working through some Buffy/Lana fantasy he’s been holding onto. That said, Ms. Kreuk certainly does look… uhm… okay… in leather. But come on, how many times can they have Lana go bad – be "cured" – and then forget everything she did and learned while bad? Now let us imagine, gentle reader, how would it play out if she remembers every single moment and just doesn’t know how to deal with it? She is tempted by the dark side but knows that Clark would never follow her there? Work with me people, Clark ain’t the only one who can be keeping secrets.
Millar and Gough have shown that they are not slaves to the comic canon so let’s see Lana Lang go bad and stay bad. This would give Superman an interesting dynamic if his worst enemies turn out to be a man he once considered his best friend and the woman who was his first love? And if Lex still misses the only friend he ever had and Lana still loves him… that there is drama gold.
I’m thinking about a spec for Smallville that brings in Hal Gordon with an origin of the Green Lantern episode and would like to integrate the start of Lana letting the bad girl out. I probably shouldn’t since it is bad form to mess with the main characters in a spec script and it has a tendency to shove it over into the fan fic slushpile. Besides, even with its ratings going up, I fear that this might be the last year for Smallville. We can only hope that the ratings stay up and the network will see that, other than Supernatural, the rest of their lineup is getting smacked around by the ratings. If it does get canceled, any Smallville spec would only be good for another year at most so it would be silly for me to spec this show.
TV is a Tough Sell
October 24th, 2005
Clint To give you an idea of how tough it would be for an outsider to come in and get a show into production, I hereby give you a partial list of shows that were put into development by the networks for the 2005/2006 season… and then dropped. Read on if you dare.
These are just the ones that made it into development and don’t include the hundreds of shows that were pitched and the spec pilots that got a no thanks. These are by established people from within the industry and with a track record… so what chance do I have of getting anyone interested in one of my shows? Optimistically, one in a million… but that is still better odds than the lottery and I’ll have a lot more fun than just buying a few thousand dollars worth of 6-49 tickets.
1/4life (abc)
20 things to do before you’re 30 (upn)
absolutely american (abc)
academy, the (mtv)
adopted (abc)
american lives (nbc)
amy coyne (fox)
anatomy of an affair (fox)
assistants, the (nbc)
au pairs, the (wb)
awesometown (fox)
before the fact (usa)
bel-air (lifetime)
bergdorf blondes (wb)
big kahuna, the (lifetime)
blue skies (nbc)
bobby cannon (abc)
born & made (usa)
borrow my crew (mtv)
boss swap (abc)
bow (wb)
briar & graves (fox)
bullheads (cbs)
catch, the (abc)
celebrity pool (bravo)
cobble hill (cbs)
commuters, the (cbs)
confessions of a dog (nbc)
confidence (usa)
conviction (cbs)
crazy (upn)
curb appeal (usa)
dante (nbc)
dark, the (tnt)
deal (nbc)
dedicated (mtv)
dennis, the (nbc)
dirtbags (fox)
dirty laundry (syndication)
don’t ask (fox)
door to the throne (abc_family)
early bird (nbc)
east of normal, west of weird (abc_family)
eastenders (fox)
edison (usa)
enemies (abc)
enemy within, the (syndication)
enough about me (abc)
expert witness (abc)
extreme makeover: wedding edition (abc)
extreme reunion (nbc)
fertile ground (fox)
flyover states, the (abc)
freak beat (hbo)
free falling (abc)
gentleman, the (fx)
granted (mtv)
grown men (wb)
halley’s comet (wb)
happy game fun bomb (comedy_central)
hard time (abc)
hate (showtime)
he got game (espn)
heartland (wb)
hitched (fox)
hollywood show, the (comedy_central)
hollywood vice (fox)
home intervention (nbc)
honorable & mrs., the (fox)
hornet’s nest (abc)
hot topics (syndication)
house arrest (mtv)
house broken (cbs)
human animals (fx)
husband swap (abc)
i.c.e. (cbs)
insiders, the (fox)
introducing lennie rose (abc)
joint custody (abc)
judge john deed (nbc)
kappa mikey (mtv)
kyra (sci_fi)
laws of chance (abc)
legal eyes (upn)
legally blonde (syndication)
let bob do it (nick_at_nite)
liquid generation tv (wb)
long island sound (abc)
loser leaves town (tbs)
love life (abc)
loved ones (and other people we hate) (nbc)
mad, the bad & the innocent, the (usa)
making waves (abc)
marriage 911 (fox)
marsha potter gets a life (abc)
mermaid (wb)
mindy & brenda (wb)
misdemeanor man (fox)
mobile home disaster (wb)
motel man (sci_fi)
murder book (fox)
my other life in brooklyn (nbc)
neighbors (abc)
new car smell (fox)
nobody’s watching (wb)
nowhere fast (fx)
ny-70 (nbc)
or best offer (fx)
peep show (fox)
play dates (abc)
pool guys (fox)
prince, the (wb)
pros & cons (abc)
pryor offenses (showtime)
queen b (fox)
ralph show, the (fox)
real beverly hillbillies, the (cbs)
real people (syndication)
red & blue (abc)
rehab (hbo)
revved (fox)
robin quivers show, the (syndication)
ron white show, the (wb)
serranos, the (nbc)
show and go (mtv)
show with a.j. calloway, the (upn)
simmons, inc. (mtv)
six borough (abc)
smoke (fox)
smoke & mirrors (usa)
soccer moms (abc)
sold! (abc)
spirit of america (fox)
sports central (comedy_central)
spring street (fox)
st. andrews (upn)
stranded (sci_fi)
stroller wars (cbs)
strong medicine: first response (lifetime)
studio, the (upn)
suburban you, the (hbo)
survival of the richest (wb)
surviving the mintz sisters (abc)
take it to the bitch house (comedy_central)
talk show diaries (upn)
testing bob (abc)
three (cbs)
three rivers (abc)
tom utopia (cbs)
triangle (upn)
true (wb)
u r here (mtv)
u.n. (fox)
ultimate mash-ups (mtv)
uncommon sense (nbc)
unhitched (fox)
unit one (abc)
untitled abrams & oteri project (abc)
untitled adam belanoff project (cbs)
untitled aisha tyler project (cbs)
untitled al madrigal project (cbs)
untitled alice greczyn project (fox)
untitled alison cross project (abc)
untitled ant hines project (fox)
untitled arlene tur project (abc)
untitled ashley gable project (lifetime)
untitled baker & fuller project (vh1)
untitled barry sonnenfeld project (cbs)
untitled bill cosby project (fox)
untitled bob saget project (abc)
untitled bobby knight project (cbs)
untitled borchart & schank project (comedy_central)
untitled brad garrett project (hbo)
untitled bret ernst project (wb)
untitled brett butler project (comedy_central)
untitled brian regan project (nbc)
untitled bruckheimer & mccall project (cbs)
untitled camryn manheim project (wb)
untitled carla kettner project (upn)
untitled carmen electra project (fox)
untitled chad hodge project (wb)
untitled christoper mcdonald project (fox)
untitled dan bucatinsky project (cbs)
untitled david arquette project (wb)
untitled david boreanaz project (abc)
untitled david hollander project (fox)
untitled dennis hopper project (nbc)
untitled diamond & weissman project (cbs)
untitled diane farr project (wb)
untitled diane keaton project (hbo)
untitled elton john project (abc)
untitled eric christian olsen project (fox)
untitled gaytons project (fox)
untitled geena davis project (cbs)
untitled greg fitzsimmons project (abc)
untitled greg giraldo project (comedy_central)
untitled haberts & berg project (fox)
untitled howard dean project (syndication)
untitled isaac mizrahi project (syndication)
untitled jamie foxx project (fx)
untitled jamie kennedy project (comedy_central)
untitled jeffrey ross project (fox)
untitled jennifer salt project (fox)
untitled jennifer westfeldt project (abc)
untitled jim sheridan project (nbc)
untitled john eisendrath espn project (espn)
untitled john eisendrath fox project (fox)
untitled ken jennings project (comedy_central)
untitled keyser & lippman project (showtime)
untitled kristin davis project (hbo)
untitled larry reitzer project (abc)
untitled larry wilmore project (fox)
untitled leguizamo & murrieta project (fox)
untitled liz heldens project (fox)
untitled luke greenfield project (fox)
untitled lynda lopez project (syndication)
untitled marissa jaret winokur project (abc)
untitled mccarthy and parker project (fox)
untitled melissa ethridge project (abc)
untitled molly shannon project (fox)
untitled mo’nique project (syndication)
untitled neil tolkin project (nbc)
untitled new york project (showtime)
untitled norm macdonald project (comedy_central)
untitled oakley & weinstein project (fox)
untitled ratner & schindel project (cbs)
untitled raven symone project (abc)
untitled rich appel project (cbs)
untitled ridley scott project (sci_fi)
untitled robert peacock project (fox)
untitled robert weide project (abc)
untitled rocco dispirito project (syndication)
untitled rod lurie project (abc)
untitled ronnie christensen project (cbs)
untitled roz chast project (abc_family)
untitled schumacher & smith project (sci_fi)
untitled scott baio project (nbc)
untitled sharon warren project (cbs)
untitled snl reality project (nbc)
untitled stephen dorff project (hbo)
untitled steve harvey project (syndication)
untitled susie essman project (cbs)
untitled tara reid project (fox)
untitled tollin-robbins project (espn)
untitled tom arnold project (abc)
untitled tom davis project (comedy_central)
untitled toni braxton project (wb)
untitled wayne brady project (nbc)
untitled will sasso project (abc)
vacation swap (abc)
vivian lives (upn)
wanted (abc)
washington street (cbs)
weekend, the (nbc)
we’re in the band (comedy_central)
what the blank (fox)
what the hell happened? (comedy_central)
who wants to be a superhero (mtv)
wing men (wb)
witchhunter robin (sci_fi)
world of trouble (nbc)
you are here (fox)
you are what you eat (abc)
zen justice (cbs)
zoe’s list (abc)
zombie chronicles (mtv)
This list is thanks to The Futon Critic , one of the finest resources for television on the web. Clicking on the link will send you to their write-up on the particular show and those who were working on it. Bookmark this site.
Goin’ to Screenwriting Expo 4
October 19th, 2005
Clint I’ve signed up for the Screenwriting Expo 4 and I’ll put up some more information about it in a later post. This will mostly be used as a learning experience and practice with the whole pitching thing. Pitching ain’t my strong suit, not even my weak suit actually, so I can use as much of it as I can get. The clincher in the deal was one of the sessions – “Breaking the Story: with Tim Minear” is billed as a simulation of the writer’s room where we are supposed to break a story for Angel, Firefly or Wonder Falls. I will insist that Angel and Firefly are two of the best shows ever to air and Wonder Falls ain’t no bad thing either. Tim is very good and I felt that The Inside ranks as the best procedurals I’ve seen so far… but it was pretty dark and that might have turned some viewers away. To top this all, the man is adapting The Moon is a Harsh Mistress into a feature film… that is just the best book that I have ever read is all. It certainly didn’t hurt that Joss Whedon will be giving a talk there. Hopefully I’ll refrain from going all fan boy geek on the guy.
Pirates – Start Your Encoders
October 14th, 2005
Clint There are several factors needed to create an environment where media piracy for financial gain is innevitable.
1.Demand for a product.
2.Financial barrier to official entry for most people.
3.An artificial level of hassle and complexity for those who can afford it.
4.An arrogant and antagonistic official provider to lower inhibitions against piracy.
5.A moderate level of difficulty to keep casual piracy low.
Read on to see how the studios and tech companies are meeting or exceeding them all.
1.The tech companies have been pushing the superior quality of High Definition for years and when the Blu-Ray and HD-DVD units become available they will spend tens of millions more trying to convince people that they need this. The television networks have been running “available in HD” tattooed over most of their programs for several years now and the film studios will in turn spend tens of millions trying to convince the consumer that they need to replace their DVD library with the new and improved HD content. All in all, they will spend upwards of a hundred million dollars trying to drive up demand for HD content.
2.The players are set to start at around $1000 and the studios will want a premium over their already available DVD content. Add to this the additional $1000 that the customers will need to spend for the lowest HD ready television able to work with the player and the barrier to entry is rapidly rising out of the reach of most people. Computers and displays that would be entirely acceptable from a technological perspective will be shut out in the draconian rights management schemes.
3.It isn’t just the cost of a Blu-Ray or HD-DVD ready television. The digital rights management used requires that the players will only send an HD signal to displays on a “trusted list”. Most every display already available, including many costing tens of thousands of dollars, will not be allowed to show a high definition image. On top of this insult, the DRM technology will allow them to strike any display or player from their trusted list so that discs will no longer play in certain players or deliver signals to specific displays. So first you will have to replace a perfectly good television with one that is trusted… and then you may have to replace that one when it is compromised by some script kiddie in Norway. Add to this the high probability that the technology will have glitches due to this DRM overhead. The region codes with DVD are far simpler and they that have a reputation of unreliability.
4.The studios start by treating everyone as thieves, liars and cheats… a they will turn around and charge a several dollar premium over DVDs when their actual cost premium will only be a few cents more. DVDs and CDs set this precedent since they cost considerably less to produce/ship/store/display than VHS tapes or LP records – but the studios and record companies charged the end user considerably more. The film industry has been considerably better than the music industry here but it looks like that will change with the HD discs. I’m a capitalist pig and so I will accept that this is the way they work… but a lot of people will take offense to the film industry using the situation to take advantage of them. Combine that with the collectors who have large libraries of content that they’ve already paid for and who feel that should count for something. I’m not in that camp, but a lot of people will think “I’ve already paid for every season of Saved by the Bell, why should I pay for it again?” I, on the other hand, will be buying the Complete Buffy in HD as soon as I can. What can I say, I’m weak.
5.The easiest and most straight forward method of pirating HD content is using one of the new pro-sumer HD cameras to simply record the image off of a trusted system. This places a $3000 to $6000 barrier in the way of casual copying. I am assuming that the DRM scheme will be cracked within days if not hours, but for the sake of argument let’s pretend that they have discovered a magic anti-piracy method that cannot be foiled. As long as we can see the content, then a video camera can see it as well. The absolute worst that the media owners and the hardware creators can do is slow it down to real time content copying. The most likely scenario sees the hackers modifying hardware to allow copying… but this leaves a technological as well a monetary barrier to the casual copy being made. Either way ensures that the dedicated pirates have the market pretty much to themselves.
They’ve pretty much covered every point and I can’t really think of any way to make it a more ideal environment for pirates.
RSS Feed
Posted in